some evangelicals are now not only saying, ‘farewell, rob bell’ but actually declaring him dead to evangelicalism.
RIP, rob bell.
as if the ‘love wins’ controversy wasn’t enough, in the first week of his new book’s release (which i read yesterday on my flight from orlando, and recommend), rob did what most of us do – had a Q and A.
and after what one person reported from a Q and A session last night in san francisco, it appears this morning that rob bell came out in support of gay marriage (i first saw the story from tony jones).
‘I am for marriage. I am for fidelity. I am for love, whether it’s a man and a woman, a woman and a woman, a man and a man. I think the ship has sailed and I think the church needs – I think this is the world we are living in and we need to affirm people wherever they are.’
conservative blogger denny burke also linked the story, although the majority of his commenters had an unsurprisingly slightly different response than those at TJs.
comments ranged from calling rob a heretic or implying he’s a false prophet (which really is nothing new) to asking if now we can say, ‘farewell, rob bell’ with a clear conscious || as if this – supporting gay marriage – was the final nail in the coffin we’ve all been waiting for.
brian mclaren received similar treatment when news broke of his supporting his gay son in a private ceremony earlier this year. for my thoughts on that situation, you can read my note to brian on his blog.
what IS intriguing to me, however, are the two quite polarized responses from folks who read the same bible – some with a more modern, conservative, traditional interpretation and others with a more progressive perspective.
last week, LifeWay researcher ed stetzer posted his most recent findings on the cultural shift toward acceptance of gay marriage. things are changing. and the shift isn’t just taking place within the church.
just in the past week, not only rob bell, but hilary clinton and republican senator rob portman have joined the growing ranks of those who have ‘evolved’ on the conversation about same sex marriage. the list is certainly likely to grow in preparation for (and even the wake of) the supreme court’s pending decision in june.
the increasing cultural disconnect between conservatives (social, political and religious) and progressives reminds me of the critical importance in our work as ambassadors of reconciliation – bridge builders.
the litmus test of our faith in christ is not whether or not we’re able to agree on political, cultural or religious secondary issues, nor (dare i say) even what it is our position is on such issues; rather, it is in our ability to love, even those with whom we may not agree.
in the same HuffPo article, rob was quoted as saying,
‘What do you do with the people that aren’t like you? What do you do with the Other? What do you do with the person that’s hardest to love?’ . . . That’s the measure of a good religion, is – you can love the people who are just like you; that’s kind of easy. So what Jesus does is takes the question and talks about fruit. He’s interested in what you actually produce. And that’s a different discussion. How do we love the people in the world that are least like us?”
as the cultural shift happens (and it is happening) regarding LGBT issues right in front of us, i wonder how well we’ll do in elevating the conversation above the yes/no || right/wrong || win/lose || in/out || us/them || polarizing rhetoric that has so often shaped this conversation, and respond in a more thoughtful, christ-like way?
maybe there’s something to all that ‘solidarity with the Other‘ language after all…
what do you think?